Unless you had different logic books in school than I did, Craig, "including" does not mean "excluding all else". I am here to communicate with other developers that are using STruts for their own applications and part of that is the concern about how the development process here has been failing. That is critical to people who use Struts. I am sorry if it implicates that people, like yourself, who were in charge of the failure. But, do you really think that learning something at this stage of your career is impossible when things don't work out? I would think that your great success would give you more room for criticism than that.
On 3/25/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 3/25/06, Jonathan Revusky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > The question is, at the very least, broadly on-topic. > > > This interpretation is wildly out of sync with the formal description of > this mailing list's purpose[1], quoted below: > > Subscribe to this list to communicate with other developers > that are using Struts for their own applications, including > questions about the installation of Struts, and the usage > of particular Struts features. > > > Jonathan Revusky > > > Craig > > [1] http://struts.apache.org/mail.html > > -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~
