Wow... as far as a George Carlin sketch goes, that's grand!
"...arrogant little a**-licking toady bastards..."
Hehe, I gotta remember that one. I think "toady" makes it special :)
Frank
James Mitchell wrote:
Now, it's obviously a valid question that Struts developers should
answer.
It _is_ an invalid question, that's why everyone is ignoring you.
And now, I'd like to respond to you with your own words, from your own
not-so-kind off list response to me (of course, censored because this is
a public list)...
... this is sh** is getting personal now. Who the f*** do you think you
are? You must be one ill-bred little f***.
I don't have to give you any feedback on your lame-a** website. I don't
have to give you anything. I don't owe you or any of your cohorts a
f***ing thing.
If you want to start maintaining human standards of behavior, the next
time somebody gives you any feedback on your work, here's what you
should say:
"Thank you."
I guess nobody ever taught you that. Do you know how bad I made you
look there? I hope I completely humiliated you.
If you f*** with me any more, I'll humiliate you some more.
People like you are very very bad for open source. Some people's first
experience of an open source project is something like Struts full of
arrogant little a**-licking toady bastards like you.
F*** you, you contemptible little sh**.
Now that that's off my chest, I shall forever send your replies to
/dev/null.
Have a wonderful day.
--
James Mitchell
P.S. "Thank you"
On Mar 27, 2006, at 2:53 PM, Jonathan Revusky wrote:
Emmanouil Batsis wrote:
Jonathan Revusky wrote:
Struts has also fallen further and further behind technically in its
space. (This has what has led to the Webwork merger so that the
"Struts umbrella" could offer something reasonably up-to-date.)
[Note: This is not a reply to Jonathan personally]
Yes, note that I am actually not the best qualified person to answer
this.
Now, it's obviously a valid question that Struts developers should
answer. They decided to abandon work on Struts 1.x and bring Webwork
over here and work on that. So they really should be the ones to
answer your question. However, one gets the sense that they don't want
to answer such questions....
I keep seeing posts claiming Struts Action/Classic is technically old
etc etc; is there a resource available summarizing how exactly this
is true?
It did not take me long using google to find the following page:
http://wiki.opensymphony.com/display/WW/Comparison+to+Struts
Of course, that list was surely worked up by the Webwork people and is
thus, not from an unbiased source. Still, I would suppose that the
points there are truthful.
In any case, the fact is that the Struts developers have decided that
they prefer to move the Webwork code over here and work on that, so
they have accepted that Webwork is better. I think that has to be
taken at face value, since, you'd think that most people in their
situation would prefer to have a tooth extracted rather than accept
that their work is inferior. But that is what happened.
Regards,
Jonathan Revusky
--
lead developer, FreeMarker project, http://freemarker.org/
FreeMarker group blog, http://freemarker.blogspot.com/
Thanks,
Manos
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
