Dakota Jack wrote:
Sigh ...... Dion, I am sorry, but I am not going to stoop this low. Come
back later when you are grown up in this business. I hate to do this but I
am not going to start at 101 with you. Someone else can. I am not going
to. You DON'T have a clue about these issues and don't even realize that
you are revealing that in spades. Please do yourself a favor and bow out
gracefully.
Dakota, if you think that Dion doesn't understand some particular issue,
just explain it to him politely. There is no need to question his
competence or intelligence or any of that. There are lots of things I
don't know and lots of things you don't know and so on. Basically, I
feel obliged to point out that this is not helpful at all.
Stepping back a sec, it's understandable that, in the overall context,
one can get hot under the collar. I have been on the receiving end of an
extraordinary amount of abuse here, but there is no need to take out
your frustrations on somebody who, AFAICS, has been pretty reasonable
and spoken in good faith. (i.e. keep your eye on the ball... ;-))
Jonathan Revusky
--
lead developer, FreeMarker project, http://freemarker.org/
On 3/29/06, Dion Gillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/30/06, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dion, you are obviously really green. Please read a bit and then come
back. Do you have any idea about architecture and design and testing
issues?
Yes, I do. Do you?
So, the use of StrutsTestCase has an effect on architecture and design?
Are you saying you can't test your code using it? I seem to do it
reasonably
easily.
On 3/29/06, Dion Gillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/30/06, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
God, Joe! If you don't know what is wrong with Struts 1.x then
stand
aside. For one, try writing decent tests. Do you test your code?
So StrutsTestCase doesn't help you?
On 3/29/06, Joe Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jonathon,
You didn't answer Dion's question. You merely summarized that
Struts
and
WebWork merged.
You did not state any technical reasons that Struts 1.x is wrong.
The question was "Do you have a list of
things that are technically wrong with Struts 1.x?"
You complain that people don't answer questions on this list and
look
what
you've just done.
So do you have an answer?
You should not use me as some kind of scapegoat to take out your
frustrations on. Take this stuff up with the Struts PMC, not
with me. >Jonathan Revusky
Very unbecoming of you Jon. Stop trying to change the subject and
answer
the question.The question is:
"Do you have a list of things that are technically wrong with
Struts
1.x
?"
Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
"You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its
back."
~Dakota Jack~
--
http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/
Chuck Norris sleeps with a night light. Not because Chuck Norris is
afraid
of the dark, but because the dark is afraid of Chuck Norris
--
"You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its
back."
~Dakota Jack~
--
http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/
Chuck Norris sleeps with a night light. Not because Chuck Norris is afraid
of the dark, but because the dark is afraid of Chuck Norris
--
"You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back."
~Dakota Jack~
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
