Actually it appears the <Table> tag was whackily generated, not the form. Do I use the AJAX theme or not? If I don't, do I not get the dojo support? I am simply confused about the expectations.
On 3/11/07, Ian Roughley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No - what I said was that I would be surprised if the <s:form> s2 tag DOES NOT generate a HTML <form> tag. This was in response to your comment "Also, is counter-intuitive for html users that a <s:form> actually renders a table, instead of simply render a <form> tag" - which implies that no HTML <form> tag is generated for the s2 <s:form> tag. /Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > This is crazy! Are you suggesting that maybe a FORM tag is written if > you > modify the templates? I would understand if you said maybe there is > not a > FORM tag generated if you DO modify the templates! Any solid framework > should be usable first and modifiable second. Is the framework usable > without > writing framework code first? > > Scott > > On 3/10/07, Ian Roughley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> > I have to agree with stanlick with this. >> > >> I would agree more work need to be done. >> > I have abandoned in my project the more complex themes of struts and >> kept >> > it in the "simple" theme (with customized tag templates here and >> there) >> > because of these "<Table>" tags coming out of nowhere. >> > If you imply a deduction that a <s:form> tag implies in the >> presence of >> a >> > <table> and that <s:textfield> are in truth >> > <tr><td>[label]</td><td><input type="text" ... </td></tr> i'm imposing >> an >> > obsolete html table structure to a page. What if I wanted to use <div> >> and >> > <span> ? >> use the xhtml_css theme >> > What if I wanted to use a different table structure? >> > >> Then you have the opportunity to customize each theme to your particular >> and specific need >> > (two fields inside a simple <td> tag, for instance ?) >> > Also, is counter-intuitive for html users that a <s:form> actually >> renders >> > a table, instead of simply render a <form> tag. >> > >> I haven't looked lately, but I imagine there is a <form> tag in there >> somewhere, otherwise I don't see how it would work. Even in the dojo >> theme, I believe the >> > As for documentation, I recommend and effort to map the relation >> between >> > tag x freemarker template so this tag customization becomes easier >> without >> > having to browse the struts.view.jsp code. >> > >> Although this would be a worthwhile documentation effort, I'm not >> convinced that it is that necessary. Each of the freemarker templates >> are named after the tag, and I have never had to look at the tags java >> code in order to determine which template is rendered. >> > >> > >> > >> > Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > 09/03/2007 18:40 >> > Please respond to >> > "Struts Users Mailing List" <user@struts.apache.org> >> > >> > >> > To >> > Struts Users Mailing List <user@struts.apache.org> >> > cc >> > >> > Subject >> > Re: Need more comprehensive AJAX Implementation Instructions >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> > >> >> Also, I have yet to see what an Action class might >> >> actually look like to handle the asynchronous call. >> >> >> > >> > It looks like any other Action. >> > >> > (BTW, Tiles is supported in S2 via the Tiles plugin, >> > but Tiles 2 is still a bit fluxful.) >> > >> > d. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> ____________________________________________________________________________________ >> >> > Don't get soaked. Take a quick peek at the forecast >> > with the Yahoo! Search weather shortcut. >> > http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#loc_weather >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
