I have dropped 2.7 into a WW app which has been live for the past week with zero (new) errors. However, as has been stated, it needs to be reworked to get the speed improvments.
----- Original message ----- From: "Musachy Barroso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <user@struts.apache.org> Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 15:03:51 -0400 Subject: Re: Struts 2 performance Struts tests pass with OGNL 2.7 musachy On 7/11/07, James Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It's not a simple JAR drop. The core XWork and Struts 2 libraries have to > be > updated to compile expressions. This will take some work, but I believe it > is > badly needed. I'm up for helping to do this work, but don't have much > experience > with the OGNL code. I also don't have commit access to the XWork code. > > What's the process for getting commit access to XWork for Struts > committers? > > James > > > On Wed Jul 11 9:39 , 'Guillaume Carré' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent: > > >2007/7/11, Musachy Barroso [EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> I think so far a couple of people have tried to decouple Struts 2 from > OGNL, > >> (so other libs like MVEL could be used), so far no patch has made it > through > >> :) > > > >have you considered upgrading to OGNL 2.7? > > > >Tapestry 4 did, there seems to be some performance improvement in this > release: > >http://blog.opencomponentry.com/2007/06/26/tapestry-412-ognl-27-released/ > > > >is it a simple JAR drop? > >-- > >Guillaume Carré > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
