As they say, the proof of the pudding is in the taste. The performance of Struts 2 is at least as good as WebWork 2, which powers a large number of excellent sites, including Atlassian Confluence and Jive Forums. Prior versions of Tapestry were also using OGNL, which seems to be one of the bottlenecks, and it too powered some excellent sites. Hopefully, James and other volunteers will be able to bring us up to date with OGNL 2.7, and maybe we will also see the "night and day" difference that Tapestry mentions.
-Ted. On 7/12/07, Ing. Andrea Vettori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/7/12, Ing. Andrea Vettori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Yes i'm sure it's true. >> So the struts related performance seems not too bad... > compared to what? Compared to nothing... they are pure numbers. They are simply just good enought (to me). If we don't have this in mind we should use assember for everything :) In the high load test, after 10 seconds you have about 90 users (the other 10 should have finished). Having a response time of 2,5 seconds for a db search and result display under such load seems very good to me. Don't you ?
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
