Pretty strange indeed. Did you remove all the validation annotations on the field setters?
-----Message d'origine----- De : beto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : vendredi 10 août 2007 11:56 À : user@struts.apache.org Objet : RE: S2 : Validation per Action method - ideas? Hi again, and thank you for your answer. I've tried using @Validations at the method level as you point out. I'll try to illustrate: I have an action, not annotated with @Validation, with three action methods; input, execute and confirm (custom action method). The input method has no annotations and is not validated as expected. The execute method is annotated with @Validations: @Validations(requiredStrings={ @RequiredStringValidator(fieldName="amount", message="Amount is required", key="amount.required") }, regexFields={ @RegexFieldValidator(fieldName="amount", expression="^\\d+$", message="Amount has to be numeric", key="amount.numeric") }) public String execute() throws Exception { ... } The confirm method is also annotated with @Validations: @Validations(expressions={ @ExpressionValidator(expression="confirm == true", message="test") }) public String confirm() throws Exception { ... } And here comes the confusing part. When I call my action with no method name indicator (say MyAction, not MyAction_confirm), both fields (amount and confirm) is validated. I just want to validate "amount" when execute is called and only the field "confirm" when the confirm method is called. What am I doing wrong? beto Arno wrote: > > This is the Validations (with a 's' at the end :-) ) that can be put on a > method. The syntax is pretty confusing but the functionality quite neat. > > http://struts.apache.org/2.x/struts2-core/apidocs/com/opensymphony/xwork2/va > lidator/annotations/Validations.html > > -----Message d'origine----- > De : beto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Envoyé : vendredi 10 août 2007 10:57 > À : user@struts.apache.org > Objet : RE: S2 : Validation per Action method - ideas? > > > Hi. > > I've tried using validation annotation (which works great) and ran into > the > scenario mentioned by Joseph. I have different action methods which > requires > different set of validation rules. I can not find out how to set up > validation annotation to differentiate the validation rules based on which > action method that is called. I do not wish to use validation xml-files if > I > can avoid it, and will probably end up creating separate action classes in > these scenarios if not anybody can point out a solution to this problem. > > Am I missing something? > > Do you have the solution Arno? :-) > > > Arno wrote: >> >> You should check the Javadoc of the >> com.opensymphony.xwork2.validator.annotations.Validation annotation. >> >> Syntax example: >> >> @Validations( >> requiredFields = >> [EMAIL PROTECTED](type = >> ValidatorType.SIMPLE, >> fieldName = "customfield", message = "You must enter a value for >> field.")}, >> requiredStrings = >> [EMAIL PROTECTED](type = >> ValidatorType.SIMPLE, >> fieldName = "stringisrequired", message = "You must enter a value for >> string.")} >> >> ) >> public String execute() throws Exception { >> return SUCCESS; >> } >> >> -----Message d'origine----- >> De : j alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Envoyé : jeudi 9 août 2007 15:38 >> À : Struts Users Mailing List >> Objet : S2 : Validation per Action method - ideas? >> >> Hi, >> >> Is there a way to declaratively restrict validations depending on the >> method >> within the Action? - this could be useful for wizard-like forms where >> each >> step of the wizard has a set of fields ; corresponds to a different >> method >> but all of them share the same Action. >> >> I can think of having an expression validator based on currentstep added >> to >> every field short-circuited ; but that's more of a workaround rather than >> the right way to do it. >> >> Thanks, >> Joseph >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/S2-%3A-Validation-per-Action-method---ideas--tf4242670 > .html#a12087696 > Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/S2-%3A-Validation-per-Action-method---ideas--tf4242670 .html#a12088476 Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
