--- On Tue, 12/9/08, Robert Graf-Waczenski wrote: > [...] I was guessing in that direction already but wanted > a guru to confirm this first, which is what you did.
Minus the "guru" part ;) > That's our naming spec and we have decided to also use > this spec for bean property names, hence the getters and > setters. I'm just saying that getmFoo() doesn't match the JavaBean spec and as such may not always work as expected; in S2 I don't think it will be recognized as a valid getter (I *think* that's what I remember from coding this up, but that was several days ago, and I'm doing well when I can remember what happened an hour ago). Dave --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
