Dave Newton wrote:
--- On Tue, 12/9/08, Robert Graf-Waczenski wrote:
[...] I was guessing in that direction already but wanted
a guru to confirm this first, which is what you did.
Minus the "guru" part ;)
That's our naming spec and we have decided to also use
this spec for bean property names, hence the getters and
setters.
I'm just saying that getmFoo() doesn't match the JavaBean spec and as such may
not always work as expected; in S2 I don't think it will be recognized as a
valid getter (I *think* that's what I remember from coding this up, but that
was several days ago, and I'm doing well when I can remember what happened an
hour ago).
getmFoo() as getter works just fine here with S2 as it did since almost
eight years with S1.
Robert
