Crombie, Joe - BRS wrote:
Hi All,
I'm currently switching to 2.1.6 and the Convention plugin for configuration. I tend to use POJOs for my Action classes, and map actions to methods.
My problem is that when I extend ActionSupport, Convention generates a
default mapping to the execute method (which I generally don't provide).

If you're extending ActionSupport there's an execute() method. (As well as input.)

I'd think the easiest, quickest, dirtiest solution would just be to provide an execute() that either provides a "nocontents" result as you said or map it to something else in the action. Making it private might work, but I haven't tried it.

Off the top of my head I don't know an easy way to not have some methods mapped.

Dave


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org

Reply via email to