Fixed in svn trunk musachy
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Musachy Barroso <musa...@gmail.com> wrote: > https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-3123 > > On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 9:24 AM, Musachy Barroso <musa...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Right now there is no way, we could add a flag that check if there are >> annotated methods, and prevents the mapping of "execute" >> >> musachy >> >> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Dave Newton <newton.d...@yahoo.com> wrote: >>> Crombie, Joe - BRS wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi All, >>>> I'm currently switching to 2.1.6 and the Convention plugin for >>>> configuration. I tend to use POJOs for my Action classes, and map >>>> actions to methods. >>>> My problem is that when I extend ActionSupport, Convention generates a >>>> default mapping to the execute method (which I generally don't provide). >>> >>> If you're extending ActionSupport there's an execute() method. (As well as >>> input.) >>> >>> I'd think the easiest, quickest, dirtiest solution would just be to provide >>> an execute() that either provides a "nocontents" result as you said or map >>> it to something else in the action. Making it private might work, but I >>> haven't tried it. >>> >>> Off the top of my head I don't know an easy way to not have some methods >>> mapped. >>> >>> Dave >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd >> > > > > -- > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd > -- "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org
