On Today at 2:02pm, DC=>Dimitrios Christodoulakis <[email protected]> wrote:
DC> [..snip..]
DC>
DC> The CONFIG_LOCATIONS is used to initialize the servletContext which in
DC> turn is used to initialize the applicationContext, right? So, I am not
DC> sure where is the correct place to add the web.xml file, or how to
DC> tell BaseStrutsTestCase to include OpenEntityManagerInViewFilter
DC> during the recreation of the framework.
DC>
The CONFIG_LOCATIONS variable is used to initialize spring only. I don't
use spring-orm, so I can't comment on how to tell BaseStrutsTestCase to
include that particular filter (or any other filter for that matter).
DC>
DC> Is that a limitation of this test class, or I am trying to include my
DC> web.xml file the wrong way?
DC>
Most probably a limitation.
DC>
DC> I am not sure if other folks using this example code dealt with
DC> something like this in the past and solved it. Haroon, I hope you
DC> don't mind my asking you again about this :)
DC>
DC> Also, a more general question: Can the proxy class be used to create
DC> and run two actions sequentially? Let's say I want to test an action
DC> in my secure namespace, meaning that some sort of login or
DC> registration action comes first.
DC>
I think you're over-stepping the bounds of unit testing here. In any case,
I have created multiple invocations of the same action in the same test
method without any problems. E.g.,
createAction(SomeAction.class, "/namespace", "actionName");
//... set some parameters
assertEquals(SUCCESS, proxy.execute());
//create action again
createAction(SomeAction.class, "/namespace", "actionName");
//... set some *different* parameters so that we expect INPUT to be
// returned
assertEquals(INPUT, proxy.execute());
There's nothing to prevent you from recreating another Action all
together. You just have to remember that every time you execute
createAction, it creates a new mock request and mock response, so you have
to populate things properly.
DC>
DC> So, could I do something like this in my test method?:
DC>
In your code below, where you say // and then execute proxy again, are you
missing some stepls where you need to supply some parameters to the
action?
DC>
DC> @Test
DC> public void testExecute() throws Exception{
DC> Login testLogin = createAction(Login.class, "/", "Login");
DC> //set my fields
DC> testLogin.setPassword("...");
DC> //execute proxy once
DC> proxy.execute();
DC> //Then create my secure action
DC> UpdateProfile testUpdateProfile =
DC> createAction(UpdateProfile.class, "/secure",
"UpdateProfile");
DC> //and then execute proxy again
DC> proxy.execute();
DC> }
DC>
DC> [..snip..]
DC>
DC> Up until now I manually created mock objects to satisfy any
DC> dependencies of the class under test: Created a user object and put in
DC> on a Session map manually to simulate a successful login action. So
DC> the motive here was to use this example test code to actually create
DC> and execute a successful test of the predecessor action (so the login
DC> action itself could add the logged in user to the session) before the
DC> actual action that I am primarily testing (updateProfile).
DC>
Smells like functional testing to me.
DC>
DC> Anyway, I sure hope I am not stretching this conversation too far by
DC> experimenting a bit further with this example. Any suggestions are
DC> appreciated.
DC>
DC> Regards.
Cheers,
--
Haroon Rafique
<[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]