It does appear to be an interesting way of doing it and it would certainly help on action class bloat, especially on actions where a form may contain lots of parameters.
In some places we've actually reverted to a hack concept of ActionForms where our web page contains "class.property" variables and when the form is posted a "class" object is instantiated instead. This has helped on our larger forms to reduce the bloat; although when using a GET method, seeing a url such as: /myaction.action?class.param1=x&class.param2=y&class.param3=z I simply don't like to see "class." as a part of my URL property names. =/ Chris > I like it. > > It has some fast way to create pages. > > And I really enjoy the possibility to pass params directly to a method, > without getters & setters. It can be new feature to S2! Helps to keep > the > Action class clean! > > See you! > > On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Frans Thamura <fr...@meruvian.org> > wrote: > > > any one look this > > > > http://www.playframework.org/ > > > > will this feature inside S2 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org
