I think they still have to be public, but I don't really remember anymore. On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 10:09 AM, <stanl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> No schit! Going to try it now. > > On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Dave Newton <davelnew...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 9:59 AM, <stanl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > I have always thought the parameters interceptor should reflect on > object > > > properties in the case where it could > > > not find a set/get method. > > > > > > > Properties haven't needed setters since ~2.1, give or take. I don't know > if > > that was an OGNL change or an S2 change, but when I updated the book for > > S2.1 that was one of the changes I had to make. Don't know if anything is > > cached or not. > > > > Dave > > >
