Hi,
Sure, I can file an issue on Jira. As for now, we do get the dates
synchronized in the correct manner from the right source.
I was reading about the DB connector and I was sure that it stated that it
supported delete as optional:
Authenticate (Optional) Specify the password column configuration property.
· Create
· Delete
· Update
· Search
· Schema
· Test
· Sync (Optional) Specify the Change Log Column configuration property.
I thought that optional was a notation for the fact that it could be
implemented by having the change log column associated with the resource. I’ll
look more into the groovy-scripts. We have had some parsing problems with
those, but that might be due to some file encoding issue. Therefore we
collected the base master data together from various sources and thought of
following the “keep it simple stupid” policy with the db-connector…☺
Regards,
Mikael
From: Francesco Chicchiriccò [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: perjantai 21. huhtikuuta 2017 11.52
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Question regarding time formats
Hi Mikael,
see my replies below.
Regards.
On 20/04/2017 10:03, Mikael Ekblom wrote:
Hi,
We have now implemented a pullaction, that is able to automatically generate
usernames and passwords from a mssql database source, that is simulating our
HR-system. So far so good.
Cool.
I can also see, that syncope is able to fetch start and end dates automatically
from the db-source(date stated as datetime column), but, when we try to sync it
the other way, we get an exception:
09:40:52.331 ERROR Error parsing value {0} of attribute Slutdatum:93
Method: handleAttribute
java.lang.NullPointerException: null
First question:
Is it now so, that syncope is able to transform and understand a datetime
format quite easily into a correct java.date format when it pulls this
information from an external source, but the conversion the other way round is
troublesome when pushing/propagating data towards the external resource? Do I
need to transform it first before the propagation? Maybe a SimpleDate formatter?
When Syncope fetches data from the db-source, we are doing pull.
Consider that such data is arriving in a format according to ConnId
specifications; FYI, ConnId supports the following types:
https://github.com/Tirasa/ConnId/blob/connid-1.4.2.0/java/connector-framework/src/main/java/org/identityconnectors/framework/common/FrameworkUtil.java#L191-L212
where, as you can see, there is no Date.
This means that the date values arrive as text, and are parsed by Syncope
according to the format specified for the mapped internal schema.
At the moment, however, during propagation the eventual conversion pattern is
simply not taken into account:
https://github.com/apache/syncope/blob/2_0_X/core/provisioning-java/src/main/java/org/apache/syncope/core/provisioning/java/MappingManagerImpl.java#L257-L263
There should be room for an improvement here: would you mind to file an issue
on JIRA about propagating Date values as formatted strings?
In that sense, it is better that it fails the other way around, because we are
to fetch the values from the HR and they should not be managed from the syncope
environment.
If such values are not to be used anywhere else in Syncope, then simply define
the internal schema as String rather than Date.
Second question:
When a connector has the SEARCH and SYNC operations associated with itself: how
is the logic supposed to work if you do have the change log column set and
deletes a tuple in the external database? Pull mode is set to incremental. On
our end here, even though we delete the tuple in the mssql hr simulation
database, the associated account is not deleted within syncope. Not even with
pull mode set to “Full reconciliation” funny enough.
What I can see, the pull action handler is not logging anything if the pull
mode is not set to full reconciliation either. Syncope and the db do have the
associated key values set correctly etc. The change log column is of a datetime
format also. Does this has something to do with it?
You need to consider that everything related to SYNC mostly depends on how the
actual connector implements such operation.
The db-table connector is possibly one of the simplest out there; among its
limitation, it is also not capable to feed Syncope with information about
deleted users.
I would suggest to use the more flexible Scripted SQL for the job; you'll need,
however, to provide your own Groovy scripts.
You might want to look at
https://github.com/apache/syncope/tree/2_0_X/fit/core-reference/src/test/resources/scriptedsql
as starting point; FYI, look how one of such sample scripts can generate DELETE
events to send back to Syncope:
https://github.com/apache/syncope/blob/2_0_X/fit/core-reference/src/test/resources/scriptedsql/SyncScript.groovy#L78
by simply considering an additional 'deleted' column.
--
Francesco Chicchiriccò
Tirasa - Open Source Excellence
http://www.tirasa.net/
Member at The Apache Software Foundation
Syncope, Cocoon, Olingo, CXF, OpenJPA, PonyMail
http://home.apache.org/~ilgrosso/