Hi, On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Michael McCandless <[email protected]> wrote: > I can appreciate this motivation, ie "convenience trumps consistency", > here. > > Still this inconsistency can lead to confusion and to bugs, but since > it's only one API that's "the exception" I think it's OK? > > But maybe we can beef up its javadocs a bit, saying "NOTE: unlike all > other APIs parsing from an InputStream, this API closes the incoming > InputStream for you for convenience" or something?
I added something along these lines in revision 1164049. BR, Jukka Zitting
