On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Jukka Zitting <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Michael McCandless > <[email protected]> wrote: >> I can appreciate this motivation, ie "convenience trumps consistency", >> here. >> >> Still this inconsistency can lead to confusion and to bugs, but since >> it's only one API that's "the exception" I think it's OK? >> >> But maybe we can beef up its javadocs a bit, saying "NOTE: unlike all >> other APIs parsing from an InputStream, this API closes the incoming >> InputStream for you for convenience" or something? > > I added something along these lines in revision 1164049.
Awesome, thanks Jukka! It looks great, but just a small typo: taken should be take in "Unlike most other Tika methods that taken an" Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com
