Is this changed from 1.3.0 to 2.0.0? I'm a bit confused by Atanu's comment and Trina's subsequent response... are we still recommending that balance_switch should be false and only be enabled during maintenance windows?
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Trina Krug <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, they will. Sorry if my answer was misleading. I was speaking > directly to the document section regarding disabling rebalancing due to > transactions aborting. > > Trina > > On Feb 10, 2016, at 2:00 PM, Atanu Mishra <[email protected]> wrote: > > Wasn't sure - I think the user will need to enable the functionality first > to see this behavior. > > Thanks, > Atanu > > ____________________ > Atanu Mishra > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Trina Krug <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Rebalancing can now be done with active transactions and they *can* >> survive across a rebalance. There may be times when a transaction is >> aborted after new transactional activity is rejected during the rebalance >> however. But most often failed operations can be (and will be) retried and >> succeed. >> >> Trina >> >> On Feb 10, 2016, at 1:11 PM, Gunnar Tapper <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Is this information still relevant? >> >> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TRAFODION/Configuration#Configuration-DisablingHBaseRegionRebalancing >> >> >> -- >> Thanks, >> >> Gunnar >> *If you think you can you can, if you think you can't you're right.* >> >> > -- Thanks, Gunnar *If you think you can you can, if you think you can't you're right.*
