Adoption of technology should be based upon things such as need, cost, ease of use, maintainability, and availability of resources, past success, amongst others.
I find that Turbine in conjunction with Velocity serves these needs very well. I have also wondered at times why this site is very quiet, and then I realize that I rarely need to post questions, since there is the archive. It would be a shame to see a great technology fall by the wayside simply because it has been successful, people learn it quickly, the community has been supportive, and because others make more noise. You used the term "several projects", which probably means several successful projects. Perhaps more noise is the answer... -----Original Message----- From: Nick Ide [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 4:10 PM To: [email protected] Subject: what is current status and likely future of turbine ? We have built several projects in the past using turbine. We are beginning a new project and trying to decide whether to use turbine or try something else. We are a little concerned that turbine is dead or dying from lack of community. My questions: 1. When will turbine 2.3.3 be released ? 2. Is anybody working on that release ? 3. Is there any active work on the turbine code base ? 4. If there is no work, is that because it all just works or because everybody has abandoned turbine in favor of something else ? 5. Probably asking the crowd since the people who voted with their feet have stopped listening, but what do you suppose people have adopted to use instead of turbine ? is it VelocityStruts ? is it Spring ? Others ? -Nick --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
