On 05.11.09 19:53, Ludwig Magnusson wrote: > Let me reply to both Sheldon and Jürgen. > The main concern of my team is that the project will close down. What will > happened then? What if other frameworks develop interesting features and > turbine stays behind?
Well, this one is easy. If you see a feature missing, come on and contribute. There is a proposal for OSGi integration, the new architecture allows for easier extension etc etc. We will be happy to integrate whatever seems to fit. As you can see, we released more than a fistful of components to be integrated in Turbine 4.0 alone this year. Dead projects look different. > I also believe that turbine is stalbe and robust if you have an application > running it. But there is actually a lot of bugs connected to M.E.T.A and the > setting up of a new project. > Perhaps this is a thing that blocks new users? Difficult question. I never used META myself. In any case, feel free to address whatever you feel needs to be changed. This is an open source project after all. Bye, Thomas. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
