Thanks for your response Ant. We're looking at a 3-mth timeframe. Most of our projects are POX-over-JMS based and JiBX was adopted in our recent implementations. Right now, we are in the evaluation phase for Tuscany, and having the JiBX databinding option will be really appreciated. I can volunteer to help with the design/coding since I'm the key advocate on my team. I'll see if I can get 1 or 2 more people to assist as well.
So, if you can provide any pointers on how to get started. Thanks, Kunle. On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 3:42 AM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 2:39 AM, Kunle Gbadamosi<[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi, > > Does anyone know if Tuscany has any plans to support JiBX data binding ? > > This is key to our decision-making on our project. > > > > Thanks, > > Kunle. > > > > > > We discussed supporting JiBX a while back, the conclusion was its > certainly possible and shouldn't be very hard, but at the time there > were no users asking for it so no one has ever coded it up. If this is > so important for your project then we can probably do something, what > time frame would you need it in? Would any of your project team be > able to help (with anything - design or coding or testing or > documentation)? > > ...ant >
