On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Kunle Gbadamosi<[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for your response Ant. We're looking at a 3-mth timeframe. Most of > our projects are POX-over-JMS based and JiBX was adopted in our recent > implementations. > Right now, we are in the evaluation phase for Tuscany, and having the JiBX > databinding option will be really appreciated. I can volunteer to help with > the design/coding since I'm the key advocate on my team. I'll see if I can > get 1 or 2 more people to assist as well. > So, if you can provide any pointers on how to get started. > Thanks, > Kunle. >
That sounds great that you'd like to help, as a way to start would it be helpful if we created some empty template code for a new databinding module that the JiBX code can be slotted into? ...ant
