Thanks a lot for answering my queries Simon. Please confirm my understanding of 2.0M5.
1. In WS binding, security header support is missing currently 2. JMS binding works as is in 1.6 3. REST + JSON is supported (i don't know the internals, but as long as it is supported, its fine) I have another question. We are currently using SDO data binding model. So, if we want to use REST with JSON on the same service interfaces that uses SDO, will it work? Is the SDO-JSON-SDO transformation supported internally? Are there any limitations? Eagerly awaiting any response :) -Anil On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Simon Laws <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi Anil > > On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 7:36 AM, Blue Diamond <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I have an application that works with binding.ws and binding.jms > transport > > bindings with SDO data binding. Now I am planning to start using 2.0M5 > and > > also want to start using REST with JSON binding. Just to know some > > information beforehand before I start the migration, are there any > > limitations in 2.0M5 or something that isn't supported of the above > > mentioned bindings? > > There is slightly different policy support in 2.x binding.ws when > compared with 1.x because we haven't added all the policy back in yet. > IIRC 2.x binding.ws currently only supports HTTP basic authentication > and HTTPS. The Rampart based WS security policies are not enabled yet. > > The rest support in 2.x is slightly different in 2.x also. There has > been a move over to using jaxrs/wink for REST so you'll see > binding.rest and implementation.jaxrs. There is also binding.jsonrpc > and binding.http which I think defaults to the JSON format. > > Binding.jms hasn't changed very much. > > What about AuthToken security policy support in 2.0M5? > > Thanks & Regards, > > Anil > > Regards > > Simon > > -- > Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org > Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com >
