Ok. I just found that the problem was some tuscany 1.6 jars in the classpath which I fixed and able to proceed.
After doing that, I found that howl jars were missing which geronimo required. I don't know why that is being used. I am basically creating a ws binding. On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Blue Diamond <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Luciano. > > I have started making import level changes & namespace fixes in my > composite.xml file to start using tuscany 2.0M5. > > I am currently getting the following exception: > > Caused by: java.lang.NoSuchMethodException: > org.apache.tuscany.sca.extensibility.ServiceDiscovery.getServiceDeclaration(java.lang.Class) > at java.lang.Class.getMethod(Class.java:1605) > at > org.apache.tuscany.sca.node.NodeFactory.getFactoryImplClass(NodeFactory.java:324) > at > org.apache.tuscany.sca.node.NodeFactory.newInstance(NodeFactory.java:179) > ... 25 more > > > Can someone help what's going wrong? > > This is how I am creating my Node: > > Contribution contrib1 = new Contribution(compositeName + "1", > getContributionJarFile()); Contribution contrib2 = new > Contribution(compositeName + "2", ContributionLocationHelper > .getContributionLocation(UnifiedConnectorService.class)); Node node = > NodeFactory.newInstance().createNode(compositeXml, contrib1, contrib2); > > > > Thanks & Regards, > Anil > > On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 8:46 PM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]>wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 6:37 AM, Blue Diamond <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Thanks a lot for answering my queries Simon. >> > Please confirm my understanding of 2.0M5. >> > 3. REST + JSON is supported (i don't know the internals, but as long as >> it >> > is supported, its fine) >> Yes >> >> > I have another question. >> > We are currently using SDO data binding model. So, if we want to use >> REST >> > with JSON on the same service interfaces that uses SDO, will it work? Is >> the >> > SDO-JSON-SDO transformation supported internally? Are there any >> limitations? >> > Eagerly awaiting any response :) >> >> I don't think we have extensively tested this path in 2.x, but the >> databinding should be able to make the transformations for you. >> >> >> -- >> Luciano Resende >> http://people.apache.org/~lresende >> http://twitter.com/lresende1975 >> http://lresende.blogspot.com/ >> > >
