Thanks Erik, I'm going to review your patch now :) The capabilities you mentioned are not implemented yet in Solrcas but I hope we can bring them there as well. Regads, Tommaso
2011/4/13 Erik Fäßler <[email protected]> > Am 13.04.2011 14:49, schrieb Jörn Kottmann: > > On 4/13/11 2:44 PM, Erik Fäßler wrote: >> >>> Hello Tommaso, >>> >>> thanks a lot for your reply :) I will follow the steps you gave me as >>> soon as there is a little time for this. >>> >>> Also thanks for the SolrCas hint. I think we already talked about this. >>> As far as I understood, Solrcas as well as the Solr-UIMA integration lack >>> some of the features offered by LuCas, for example the alignment of >>> TokenStreams which allows you to merge multiple CAS indexes into a single >>> Lucene field where position_increments are adjusted to stack Lucene tokens >>> with the same offsets. Please (!!) tell me when I'm wrong here, as I am >>> still working on my own ways to use UIMA together with Solr. >>> >> >> I might have time next week to work on the Lucas component, because I also >> need it for a project. >> Maybe that would be a good chance to apply and test your patch. >> >> Jörn >> > Great - as its best to get things done quickly, I just updated my version > to the latest trunk version, made sure the tests are still running and > created the patch. The corresponding Jira issue can be found at > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-2126 > > If something is wrong with the issue, please let me know - it's the first > I've created (e.g. I expect the "Affects Version/s" field to not match the > issue, but I could be wrong). > > Erik > ** >
