Hello again Erik, from what I've seen and tested your patch looks good, if Jörn's tests behave as expected I think we can commit it. Regards, Tommaso
2011/4/13 Tommaso Teofili <[email protected]> > Thanks Erik, > I'm going to review your patch now :) > The capabilities you mentioned are not implemented yet in Solrcas but I > hope we can bring them there as well. > Regads, > Tommaso > > 2011/4/13 Erik Fäßler <[email protected]> > >> Am 13.04.2011 14:49, schrieb Jörn Kottmann: >> >> On 4/13/11 2:44 PM, Erik Fäßler wrote: >>> >>>> Hello Tommaso, >>>> >>>> thanks a lot for your reply :) I will follow the steps you gave me as >>>> soon as there is a little time for this. >>>> >>>> Also thanks for the SolrCas hint. I think we already talked about this. >>>> As far as I understood, Solrcas as well as the Solr-UIMA integration lack >>>> some of the features offered by LuCas, for example the alignment of >>>> TokenStreams which allows you to merge multiple CAS indexes into a single >>>> Lucene field where position_increments are adjusted to stack Lucene tokens >>>> with the same offsets. Please (!!) tell me when I'm wrong here, as I am >>>> still working on my own ways to use UIMA together with Solr. >>>> >>> >>> I might have time next week to work on the Lucas component, because I >>> also need it for a project. >>> Maybe that would be a good chance to apply and test your patch. >>> >>> Jörn >>> >> Great - as its best to get things done quickly, I just updated my version >> to the latest trunk version, made sure the tests are still running and >> created the patch. The corresponding Jira issue can be found at >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-2126 >> >> If something is wrong with the issue, please let me know - it's the first >> I've created (e.g. I expect the "Affects Version/s" field to not match the >> issue, but I could be wrong). >> >> Erik >> ** >> > >
