I think so too. Have created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-3765to cover this work.
Eddie On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Peter Klügl <[email protected]>wrote: > Am 22.04.2014 18:20, schrieb Peter Klügl: > > Am 22.04.2014 18:10, schrieb Eddie Epstein: > >> The current design supports passing a specific view to an annotator: > >> map the desired view to the default view and do not declare the > >> annotator view aware by declaring input or output sofas. > >> > >> An alternate, unambiguous design would be that the default view > >> should always be delivered to the process method. Is this a better > >> model for you? > > Well, yes, if the analysis engine specifies no input views. I think that > would be reasonable and a better solution since the aggregate can only > map to that view. > > Peter > > >
