Thanks :-) Peter
Am 23.04.2014 00:07, schrieb Eddie Epstein: > I think so too. Have created > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-3765to cover this work. > > Eddie > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Peter Klügl <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Am 22.04.2014 18:20, schrieb Peter Klügl: >>> Am 22.04.2014 18:10, schrieb Eddie Epstein: >>>> The current design supports passing a specific view to an annotator: >>>> map the desired view to the default view and do not declare the >>>> annotator view aware by declaring input or output sofas. >>>> >>>> An alternate, unambiguous design would be that the default view >>>> should always be delivered to the process method. Is this a better >>>> model for you? >> Well, yes, if the analysis engine specifies no input views. I think that >> would be reasonable and a better solution since the aggregate can only >> map to that view. >> >> Peter >> >> >>
