This should work just fine and should remove both contained annotations.
I just tested it with the current trunk and the following script:
DECLARE T1;
"A B" -> T1;
"B" -> T1;
"B" -> T1;
(T1{-> UNMARK(T1)}){PARTOFNEQ(T1)};
If applied on the test "A B", only the largest annotation remains.
Can you test it with the current trunk in case I fixed the bug a few
minutes ago by accident. If not, can you give me more information about
the context of your rule?
Best,
Peter
Am 12.02.2015 um 10:12 schrieb Silvestre Losada:
I dont know if this is a bug or if it is wokring well. I have the following
annotations.
AnnotationA
begin:0
ends:8
id:1
AnnotationA
begin:4
ends:8
id:2
AnnotationA
begin: 4
ends:8
id:3
Then if apply the following ruta
(AnnotationA{-> UNMARK(AnnotationA)}){PARTOFNEQ(AnnotationA)};
The output is
AnnotationA
begin:0
ends:8
id:1
AnnotationA
begin: 4
ends:8
id:3
I expect that annotations with id 2 and 3 will be removed. Is there any way
to remove both
Kind regards
