Le mardi 08 avril 2008 à 15:15 -0700, Nathan Bubna a écrit :
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 2:10 PM, Charles Harvey III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ok.  I tried and tried and I cannot get the ServletConfig to where I need it
> > so
> >  I can create a new VelocityView.  The best I can get is a ServletContext.
> 
> That is a bummer.  Thank you!  Seriously, this exposes a signficant
> shortcoming in the plans to make it easy to integrate Tools into other
> frameworks.  It also made me realize that i didn't provide proper
> Filter support either.  It needs to be easier to init() a VelocityView
> (whether with a ServletConfig, FilterConfig or neither).  I'll try to
> set aside some time to fix that this week.  It'll mean we need to do
> another beta, i'm sure, but i think it'll be well worth it.

I noted this fact in http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELTOOLS-94

:-)

It's some code you left apart for some reason...


  Claude

> >  ------------------------------------------------------------------
> >  VelocityView velocityView = new VelocityView( getServletContext() );
> >  Context context = velocityView.getContext( request, response );
> >  ------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >  And, looking at the code for VelocityView, when you create a new
> > VelocityView
> >  with a ServletContext, it never calls the init(ServletConfig config)
> > method.
> >  So, the tools don't get configured.  When I do $params.get('thing') it
> > tells me:
> >
> >   Request is null. ParameterTool must be initialized first!
> 
> Actually, this means the tools did get configured.  This just means
> that the tool was never given access to the HttpServletRequest; the
> tools aren't being properly initialized.
> 
> You could just precede $params.thing with $params.setRequest($request)
> to make this work, but obviously that shouldn't be necessary and would
> not work for tools who use configure() instead of setters.
> 
> >  So, I tried it the "standalone" way:
> >  ------------------------------------------------------------------
> >  ToolManager manager = new ToolManager();
> >  if( getToolboxConfigLocation() != null )
> >  {
> >    manager.configure( getServletContext().getRealPath(
> > getToolboxConfigLocation() ) );
> >  }
> >  manager.setVelocityEngine( getVelocityEngine() );
> >  Context context = manager.createContext();
> >  ------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >  And I get the same result.
> 
> As expected.  The code above has no knowledge of ServletRequests, so
> it would be unable to tell tools about them.
> 
> >  One other attempt was made:
> >  ------------------------------------------------------------------
> >  ViewToolContext context = new ViewToolContext( getVelocityEngine(),
> >                                               request, response,
> > getServletContext() );
> >  ------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >  This time, no errors.  But the tools don't work.  I see a bunch of
> > $link.setRelative()
> >  all over the page.  Nothing renders.
> 
> That's because the ViewToolContext only knows how to find tools.  It
> doesn't create them at all.
> 
> >
> >  Am I close?  Way off?  Any help is much appreciated.
> >
> 
> Your last example is actually headed in the right direction.
> Unfortunately, since you can't use VelocityView until i fix it, it's a
> little more complicated.  Here's the gist, though i'll have to leave
> you to fill in the blanks for the moment:
> 
> the first goal is to create a FactoryConfiguration, then configure a
> new ToolboxFactory instance with that config.  this may look something
> like this (see VelocityView.configure(ServletConfig, ToolboxFactory)
> for a much more involved example):
> 
> FactoryConfiguration config = ConfigurationUtils.getAutoLoaded(); //
> read javadoc on this!
> ToolboxFactory factory = new ToolboxFactory();
> factory.configure(config);
> 
> keep this factory around for the life of the app.  you only want the
> code above to happen once, not on every request!
> 
> this once-per-app initialization is also a good place to create your
> application-scoped toolbox and put that in the servlet context.  that
> code is ripped from VelocityView.init(ServletConfig,ToolboxFactory)
> and looks roughly like this:
> 
>         Toolbox appTools = factory.createToolbox(Scope.APPLICATION);
>         if (appTools != null &&
>             servletContext.getAttribute(Toolbox.class.getName()) == null)
>         {
>             servletContext.setAttribute(Toolbox.class.getName(), appTools);
>         }
> 
> 
> with that, the application level stuff should be ready to go; now we
> just need to prep some things before every request.  so, before you
> create that ViewToolContext in your last example above, use your
> ToolboxFactory and do the following (this code is ripped from
> VelocityView.prepareToolboxes()):
> 
>         String key = Toolbox.class.getName();
>         if (factory.hasTools(Scope.REQUEST)
>             && request.getAttribute(key) == null)
>         {
>             // add request toolbox, if any
>             Toolbox reqTools = factory.createToolbox(Scope.REQUEST);
>             if (reqTools != null)
>             {
>                 request.setAttribute(key, reqTools);
>             }
>         }
> 
>         if (factory.hasTools("session"))
>         {
>              HttpSession session = request.getSession(true);
>               // allow only one thread at a time
>                synchronized(factory)
>                 {
>                     if (session.getAttribute(key) == null)
>                     {
>                         Toolbox sessTools =
>                             factory.createToolbox("session");
>                         session.setAttribute(key, sessTools);
>                     }
>                 }
>             }
> 
> 
> This creates the Toolbox instances for the current session and request
> and puts them where the ViewToolContext can find them.  Once all of
> the above is done, create your ViewToolContext and return that.
> 
> i think that should do the trick.  sorry this is more complicated that
> i'd hoped.  i'll try and whip the VelocityView init code into
> something more forgiving and get a new beta out.  Thanks for bringing
> attention to this deficit. :)
> 
> >  Thanks again.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >  Charlie
> >
> >
> >  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to