That's great news!  Thanks for the update.  Hopefully i'll get my act
together and push out 2.0-beta2 in the next week.  No promises, of
course. :)

On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Charles Harvey III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nathan,
>  I of course never got around to doing any of this work.  But I checked
> Subversion
>  and saw that you had been making lots of changes.
>
>  So I checked out the code last night and did a build of 2.0-SNAPSHOT,
> dropped it
>  into my project and lo and behold, it worked!  No changes.  I had my own
> tools
>  ready for tools-1.4 (which meant taking out the dependency) so everything
> was
>  ready.
>
>  I went from
>   spring-1.2.9.jar
>   velocity-tools-1.4.jar
>
>  to
>   spring-2.5.4.jar
>   spring-web-2.5.4.jar
>   spring-webmvc-2.5.4.jar  (the Spring people broke out more code in the new
> version)
>   velocity-tools-2.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
>
>  And everything is great.  Great stuff.  Thanks so much for taking the time
> to work
>  on all of this.
>
>
>
>  Charlie
>
>
>
>  Nathan Bubna said the following on 4/17/2008 11:53 PM:
>
>
> > Hey Charlie,
> >
> > Any luck getting this to work yet?  Just curious...
> >
> > thanks,
> > nathan
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Nathan Bubna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 2:10 PM, Charles Harvey III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > >  > Ok.  I tried and tried and I cannot get the ServletConfig to where I
> need it
> > >  > so
> > >  >  I can create a new VelocityView.  The best I can get is a
> ServletContext.
> > >
> > >  That is a bummer.  Thank you!  Seriously, this exposes a signficant
> > >  shortcoming in the plans to make it easy to integrate Tools into other
> > >  frameworks.  It also made me realize that i didn't provide proper
> > >  Filter support either.  It needs to be easier to init() a VelocityView
> > >  (whether with a ServletConfig, FilterConfig or neither).  I'll try to
> > >  set aside some time to fix that this week.  It'll mean we need to do
> > >  another beta, i'm sure, but i think it'll be well worth it.
> > >
> > >
> > >  >  ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >  >  VelocityView velocityView = new VelocityView( getServletContext() );
> > >  >  Context context = velocityView.getContext( request, response );
> > >  >  ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >  >
> > >  >  And, looking at the code for VelocityView, when you create a new
> > >  > VelocityView
> > >  >  with a ServletContext, it never calls the init(ServletConfig config)
> > >  > method.
> > >  >  So, the tools don't get configured.  When I do $params.get('thing')
> it
> > >  > tells me:
> > >  >
> > >  >   Request is null. ParameterTool must be initialized first!
> > >
> > >  Actually, this means the tools did get configured.  This just means
> > >  that the tool was never given access to the HttpServletRequest; the
> > >  tools aren't being properly initialized.
> > >
> > >  You could just precede $params.thing with $params.setRequest($request)
> > >  to make this work, but obviously that shouldn't be necessary and would
> > >  not work for tools who use configure() instead of setters.
> > >
> > >
> > >  >  So, I tried it the "standalone" way:
> > >  >  ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >  >  ToolManager manager = new ToolManager();
> > >  >  if( getToolboxConfigLocation() != null )
> > >  >  {
> > >  >    manager.configure( getServletContext().getRealPath(
> > >  > getToolboxConfigLocation() ) );
> > >  >  }
> > >  >  manager.setVelocityEngine( getVelocityEngine() );
> > >  >  Context context = manager.createContext();
> > >  >  ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >  >
> > >  >  And I get the same result.
> > >
> > >  As expected.  The code above has no knowledge of ServletRequests, so
> > >  it would be unable to tell tools about them.
> > >
> > >
> > >  >  One other attempt was made:
> > >  >  ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >  >  ViewToolContext context = new ViewToolContext( getVelocityEngine(),
> > >  >                                               request, response,
> > >  > getServletContext() );
> > >  >  ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >  >
> > >  >  This time, no errors.  But the tools don't work.  I see a bunch of
> > >  > $link.setRelative()
> > >  >  all over the page.  Nothing renders.
> > >
> > >  That's because the ViewToolContext only knows how to find tools.  It
> > >  doesn't create them at all.
> > >
> > >
> > >  >
> > >  >  Am I close?  Way off?  Any help is much appreciated.
> > >  >
> > >
> > >  Your last example is actually headed in the right direction.
> > >  Unfortunately, since you can't use VelocityView until i fix it, it's a
> > >  little more complicated.  Here's the gist, though i'll have to leave
> > >  you to fill in the blanks for the moment:
> > >
> > >  the first goal is to create a FactoryConfiguration, then configure a
> > >  new ToolboxFactory instance with that config.  this may look something
> > >  like this (see VelocityView.configure(ServletConfig, ToolboxFactory)
> > >  for a much more involved example):
> > >
> > >  FactoryConfiguration config = ConfigurationUtils.getAutoLoaded(); //
> > >  read javadoc on this!
> > >  ToolboxFactory factory = new ToolboxFactory();
> > >  factory.configure(config);
> > >
> > >  keep this factory around for the life of the app.  you only want the
> > >  code above to happen once, not on every request!
> > >
> > >  this once-per-app initialization is also a good place to create your
> > >  application-scoped toolbox and put that in the servlet context.  that
> > >  code is ripped from VelocityView.init(ServletConfig,ToolboxFactory)
> > >  and looks roughly like this:
> > >
> > >        Toolbox appTools = factory.createToolbox(Scope.APPLICATION);
> > >        if (appTools != null &&
> > >            servletContext.getAttribute(Toolbox.class.getName()) == null)
> > >        {
> > >            servletContext.setAttribute(Toolbox.class.getName(),
> appTools);
> > >        }
> > >
> > >
> > >  with that, the application level stuff should be ready to go; now we
> > >  just need to prep some things before every request.  so, before you
> > >  create that ViewToolContext in your last example above, use your
> > >  ToolboxFactory and do the following (this code is ripped from
> > >  VelocityView.prepareToolboxes()):
> > >
> > >        String key = Toolbox.class.getName();
> > >        if (factory.hasTools(Scope.REQUEST)
> > >            && request.getAttribute(key) == null)
> > >        {
> > >            // add request toolbox, if any
> > >            Toolbox reqTools = factory.createToolbox(Scope.REQUEST);
> > >            if (reqTools != null)
> > >            {
> > >                request.setAttribute(key, reqTools);
> > >            }
> > >        }
> > >
> > >        if (factory.hasTools("session"))
> > >        {
> > >             HttpSession session = request.getSession(true);
> > >              // allow only one thread at a time
> > >               synchronized(factory)
> > >                {
> > >                    if (session.getAttribute(key) == null)
> > >                    {
> > >                        Toolbox sessTools =
> > >                            factory.createToolbox("session");
> > >                        session.setAttribute(key, sessTools);
> > >                    }
> > >                }
> > >            }
> > >
> > >
> > >  This creates the Toolbox instances for the current session and request
> > >  and puts them where the ViewToolContext can find them.  Once all of
> > >  the above is done, create your ViewToolContext and return that.
> > >
> > >  i think that should do the trick.  sorry this is more complicated that
> > >  i'd hoped.  i'll try and whip the VelocityView init code into
> > >  something more forgiving and get a new beta out.  Thanks for bringing
> > >  attention to this deficit. :)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >  >  Thanks again.
> > >  >
> > >  >
> > >  >
> > >  >
> > >  >  Charlie
> > >  >
> > >  >
> > >  >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >  >  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >  >  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >  >
> > >  >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to