On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Christopher Schultz <ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote: > Nathan, > > On 9/10/2010 2:40 PM, Nathan Bubna wrote: >> i, personally, will not be patching or releasing anymore Tools 1.x >> stuff > > It's that second one that is more important. If there are unlikely to be > any further 1.x releases, then it's not worth it. Maybe I'll look at the > unresolved 1.4 issues and see if another release would actually be worth it.
if you think it is, i am willing to help. but i'm not gonna spearhead the thing. > Is 2.0 relatively backward-compatible with 1.4? I wish I could have a > software release that only dealt with library upgrades. Mmmm... that'd > be nice. yes, i worked pretty hard to maintain a significant level of compatibility for 2.0, to give people some time to change before 2.1 starts stripping out the B.C. stuff. > -chris > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@velocity.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@velocity.apache.org
