That's not good ... we're still on xfire-1.0 because of this ...
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Sebastien Cesbron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 2:36 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [xfire-user] Any Workarounds for XFIRE-739: wsdl: doesn't
describe pojos in xsd ?


Sorry but it seems this is not fix in the last release (1.2.4) so we
cannot use JAXB2.0 annotations with xfire 1.2.4

Seb


On 12/18/06, Christopher Moesel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 

        Thanks Tom-- it's very much appreciated!
        
        -Chris
        
        -----Original Message-----
        From: Tomek Sztelak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 12:34 PM 
        To: [email protected]
        Subject: Re: [xfire-user] Any Workarounds for XFIRE-739: wsdl:
doesn't
        describe pojos in xsd ?
        
        Hi
        Hard to tell any particular date. I didn't look at this bug yet,
Dan 
        is out of country, but we will try to fix this before next
release,
        which should be some time soon.
        
        On 12/18/06, Ruth, Brice D <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
        >
        > 
        > Ugh, looks like you might be right. Dan, Tom - any ETA on
this?
        >
        >
        > -----Original Message-----
        > From: Christopher Moesel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
        > Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 10:44 AM
        > To: [email protected]
        > Subject: RE: [xfire-user] Any Workarounds for XFIRE-739: wsdl:
doesn't
        > describe pojos in xsd ?
        >
        >
        >
        >
        > The release notes for 1.2.3 list:
        >
        >
        >
        > -          JAXB WSDL generation fix
        >
        >
        >
        > Looking through the resolved bugs for that release, I think
that the 
        release
        > notes may have been referring to XFIRE-568: "JAXB 2.0 with
Annotations
        > generates invalid schema imports".  Unfortunately, that is a
        completely
        > different problem than XFIRE-739, which is still marked
unresolved in 
        the
        > bug tracker.
        >
        >
        >
        > -Chris
        >
        >
        >
        > -----Original Message-----
        > From: Ruth, Brice D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        > Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 11:02 AM 
        > To: [email protected]
        > Subject: RE: [xfire-user] Any Workarounds for XFIRE-739: wsdl:
doesn't
        > describe pojos in xsd ?
        >
        >
        >
        >
        > That's disturbing news. Dan or Tom - can you shed any light on
this? I
        > remember from the 1.2.3 release notes that this was supposed
to have
        been
        > fixed.
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        > -Brice
        >
        >
        >
        >
        > -----Original Message-----
        > From: Christopher Moesel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        > Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 8:53 AM 
        > To: [email protected]
        > Subject: RE: [xfire-user] Any Workarounds for XFIRE-739: wsdl:
doesn't
        > describe pojos in xsd ?
        >
        > I am using the 1.2.3 release (details below).  I suspect it
didn't
        make it
        > into the release since the bug has not been closed out in the
tracker
        (and
        > since I'm still having problems!).
        >
        >
        > 
        > I am using:
        >
        >
        >
        > Xfire-all-1.2.3
        >
        > Xfire-jsr181-api-1.0-M1
        >
        > Jaxb-api-2.0
        >
        > Jaxb-impl-2.0.1
        >
        > Jaxb-xjc-2.0.1
        >
        >
        > 
        > Thanks,
        >
        > Chris
        >
        >
        >
        > -----Original Message-----
        > From: Ruth, Brice D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        > Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 9:37 AM 
        > To: [email protected]
        > Subject: RE: [xfire-user] Any Workarounds for XFIRE-739: wsdl:
doesn't
        > describe pojos in xsd ?
        >
        >
        >
        >
        > Are you using 1.2.3? This was supposed to have been fixed in
the
        latest
        > release. I, too, have this problem, but hadn't yet been able
to test
        the
        > latest release.
        >
        >
        > 
        >
        >
        > -Brice
        >
        >
        >
        >
        > -----Original Message-----
        > From: Christopher Moesel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        > Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 7:41 AM
        > To: [email protected]
        > Subject: [xfire-user] Any Workarounds for XFIRE-739: wsdl:
doesn't
        describe
        > pojos in xsd ? 
        >
        > I've recently attempted to change from Aegis to JAXB 2.0 for
my XML
        binding.
        >  I am using a JSR181 code-first deployment.  It appears,
however, that
        the
        > generated WSDL does not contain schema definitions for any of
my POJOs 
        (nor
        > ArrayOfString). It looks like this is a known bug and has been
        discussed on
        > the list previously.
        >
        >
        >
        > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/XFIRE-739 
        >
        >
        >
        > Are there any known workarounds, or do I need to go back to
Aegis?  Is
        there
        > an expected release that the bugfix will be a part of?
        >
        >
        >
        > Thanks, as always, for a great product!  We certainly
appreciate all 
        of the
        > hard work you put into this!
        >
        >
        >
        > -Chris
        
        
        --
        -----
        When one of our products stops working, we'll blame another
vendor
        within 24 hours.
        
        
--------------------------------------------------------------------- 
        To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
        
            http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
        
        
        
--------------------------------------------------------------------- 
        To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
        
            http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
        
        


Reply via email to