Can you paste your configuration? I'm having a hard time reproducing this and wondering if it might be a configuration. If you can't post it to the list feel free to send the relevant files to me privately. Thanks,
- Dan On 1/22/07, Henri Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Did the snapshot is available ? This problem is very serious for us... >2007/1/20, Henri Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > The fix will be available in 1.2.5 so ? > > Did there is a snapshot available ? > > Regards. > > 2007/1/19, Brice Ruth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Thanks for your persistence and perseverance on this, Dan - it is much > > appreciated. > > > > Brice > > > > > > On 1/19/07, Dan Diephouse < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > *sigh* - I did think I fixed that issue, but I'll take a peek over the > > weekend and publish a SNAPSHOT out with a fix. I'm way behind on XFire this > > week, but will try to catch up this weekend... Thanks for your patience, > > > > > > - Dan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 1/11/07, Ruth, Brice D < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > That's not good ... we're still on xfire-1.0 because of this ... > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Sebastien Cesbron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 2:36 AM > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [xfire-user] Any Workarounds for XFIRE-739: wsdl: doesn't > > describe pojos in xsd ? > > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry but it seems this is not fix in the last release (1.2.4) so we > > cannot use JAXB2.0 annotations with xfire 1.2.4 > > > > > > > > Seb > > > > > > > > > > > > On 12/18/06, Christopher Moesel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Thanks Tom-- it's very much appreciated! > > > > > > > > > > -Chris > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Tomek Sztelak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 12:34 PM > > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > > Subject: Re: [xfire-user] Any Workarounds for XFIRE-739: wsdl: doesn't > > > > > describe pojos in xsd ? > > > > > > > > > > Hi > > > > > Hard to tell any particular date. I didn't look at this bug yet, Dan > > > > > is out of country, but we will try to fix this before next release, > > > > > which should be some time soon. > > > > > > > > > > On 12/18/06, Ruth, Brice D <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ugh, looks like you might be right. Dan, Tom - any ETA on this? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: Christopher Moesel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] > > > > > > Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 10:44 AM > > > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > > > Subject: RE: [xfire-user] Any Workarounds for XFIRE-739: wsdl: > > doesn't > > > > > > describe pojos in xsd ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The release notes for 1.2.3 list: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - JAXB WSDL generation fix > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Looking through the resolved bugs for that release, I think that the > > > > > release > > > > > > notes may have been referring to XFIRE-568: "JAXB 2.0 with > > Annotations > > > > > > generates invalid schema imports". Unfortunately, that is a > > > > > completely > > > > > > different problem than XFIRE-739, which is still marked unresolved > > in > > > > > the > > > > > > bug tracker. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Chris > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: Ruth, Brice D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 11:02 AM > > > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > > > Subject: RE: [xfire-user] Any Workarounds for XFIRE-739: wsdl: > > doesn't > > > > > > describe pojos in xsd ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That's disturbing news. Dan or Tom - can you shed any light on this? > > I > > > > > > remember from the 1.2.3 release notes that this was supposed to have > > > > > been > > > > > > fixed. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Brice > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: Christopher Moesel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 8:53 AM > > > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > > > Subject: RE: [xfire-user] Any Workarounds for XFIRE-739: wsdl: > > doesn't > > > > > > describe pojos in xsd ? > > > > > > > > > > > > I am using the 1.2.3 release (details below). I suspect it didn't > > > > > make it > > > > > > into the release since the bug has not been closed out in the > > tracker > > > > > (and > > > > > > since I'm still having problems!). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am using: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Xfire-all-1.2.3 > > > > > > > > > > > > Xfire-jsr181-api-1.0-M1 > > > > > > > > > > > > Jaxb-api-2.0 > > > > > > > > > > > > Jaxb-impl-2.0.1 > > > > > > > > > > > > Jaxb-xjc-2.0.1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > Chris > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: Ruth, Brice D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 9:37 AM > > > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > > > Subject: RE: [xfire-user] Any Workarounds for XFIRE-739: wsdl: > > doesn't > > > > > > describe pojos in xsd ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Are you using 1.2.3? This was supposed to have been fixed in the > > > > > latest > > > > > > release. I, too, have this problem, but hadn't yet been able to test > > > > > the > > > > > > latest release. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Brice > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: Christopher Moesel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 7:41 AM > > > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > > > Subject: [xfire-user] Any Workarounds for XFIRE-739: wsdl: doesn't > > > > > describe > > > > > > pojos in xsd ? > > > > > > > > > > > > I've recently attempted to change from Aegis to JAXB 2.0 for my XML > > > > > binding. > > > > > > I am using a JSR181 code-first deployment. It appears, however, > > that > > > > > the > > > > > > generated WSDL does not contain schema definitions for any of my > > POJOs > > > > > (nor > > > > > > ArrayOfString). It looks like this is a known bug and has been > > > > > discussed on > > > > > > the list previously. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/XFIRE-739 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Are there any known workarounds, or do I need to go back to Aegis? > > Is > > > > > there > > > > > > an expected release that the bugfix will be a part of? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, as always, for a great product! We certainly appreciate all > > > > > of the > > > > > > hard work you put into this! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Chris > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > ----- > > > > > When one of our products stops working, we'll blame another vendor > > > > > within 24 hours. > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > To unsubscribe from this list please visit: > > > > > > > > > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > To unsubscribe from this list please visit: > > > > > > > > > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Dan Diephouse > > > Envoi Solutions > > > http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog > > > > > > > > -- > > Brice Ruth > > Software Engineer, Madison WI > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
-- Dan Diephouse Envoi Solutions http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog
