Hi Uwe, [email protected] wrote:
> On 01/18/2014 06:51 PM, [email protected] wrote: >> it works nicely with calling mashall/unmarshall myself, providing a >> custom DataHolder. the only inconvenience is, that - calling >> unmarshall - i need to know what the root-type is. > PS: i just realized i could just pass null as the root object, so the > above statement is plain wrong. Yes, that argument is only required if you absolutely want to fill an existing object. > sorry, uwe No problem, Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
