Sure. But does this have any practical significance if somebody keeps 1-2 days of logs around?
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Mahadev Konar <[email protected]> wrote: > Ted, > The connection is that with ZOOKEEPER-22 we will have to keep logs so > that we can go back in time. Since we might have old requests coming > along because requests will be retried, we need to keep enough logs to > keep that information available. Does that explain it? > > thanks > mahadev > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Mahadev, > > > > What is the connection here? > > > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Mahadev Konar <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> Jun, > >> Thats a good ask. We dont have that on the roadmap yet. I think with > >> ZOOKEEPER-22 that might be necessary. Please open a jira for that. We > >> should probably address that with ZOOKEEPER-22 in mind. > >> > >> > >> thanks > >> mahadev > >> > >> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Jun Rao <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > I like to have ZK itself manage the amount of snapshots and logs kept, > >> > instead of relying on the PurgeTxnLog utility. Is that on the roadmap > >> > already? > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > > >> > Jun > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> thanks > >> mahadev > >> @mahadevkonar > >> > > > > > > -- > thanks > mahadev > @mahadevkonar >
