Not really Ted. We just have to make sure enough logs are there, if ZK is configured to keep more htan the bare minimum, well and good!
thanks mahadev On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote: > Sure. > > But does this have any practical significance if somebody keeps 1-2 days of > logs around? > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Mahadev Konar <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Ted, >> The connection is that with ZOOKEEPER-22 we will have to keep logs so >> that we can go back in time. Since we might have old requests coming >> along because requests will be retried, we need to keep enough logs to >> keep that information available. Does that explain it? >> >> thanks >> mahadev >> >> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Mahadev, >> > >> > What is the connection here? >> > >> > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Mahadev Konar <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> >> Jun, >> >> Thats a good ask. We dont have that on the roadmap yet. I think with >> >> ZOOKEEPER-22 that might be necessary. Please open a jira for that. We >> >> should probably address that with ZOOKEEPER-22 in mind. >> >> >> >> >> >> thanks >> >> mahadev >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Jun Rao <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> >> > >> >> > I like to have ZK itself manage the amount of snapshots and logs kept, >> >> > instead of relying on the PurgeTxnLog utility. Is that on the roadmap >> >> > already? >> >> > >> >> > Thanks, >> >> > >> >> > Jun >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> thanks >> >> mahadev >> >> @mahadevkonar >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> thanks >> mahadev >> @mahadevkonar >> > -- thanks mahadev @mahadevkonar
