>Did the patch for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1336 >not do a good enough job on that? Missed that - thanks.
On 1/4/12 10:20 AM, "Patrick Hunt" <[email protected]> wrote: >On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Jordan Zimmerman ><[email protected]> wrote: >> * Can someone give more detail on Op.check()? I assume it generates an >> error if the version of the path doesn't match, but the doc is confusing >> to me. What happens if the transaction has both a setData and a check? >> > >I believe processing stops as soon as a check fails. We should clarify >that in the javadocs though. > >> * Does ZooKeeper.multi() guarantee that there will be exactly 1 OpResult >> for every Op in the transaction. Further, is there an ordering guarantee >> for the OpResult list - i.e. the OpResults are in the same order as the >> Ops argument? If this isn't so, I don't see how someone could correlate >>an >> Op to its result. > >Did the patch for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1336 >not do a good enough job on that? > >> >> On 1/4/12 7:30 AM, "Ted Dunning" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>Not really. >>> >>>On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 12:47 AM, Jordan Zimmerman >>><[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Is there documentation on the multi/transaction feature added in 3.4 >>>>other >>>> than the Javadoc? >>>> >>>> -JZ >>>> >>>> >> >
