If any of this needs more detail please do update the patch. Thanks.
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <[email protected]> wrote: >>Did the patch for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1336 >>not do a good enough job on that? > Missed that - thanks. > > > > On 1/4/12 10:20 AM, "Patrick Hunt" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Jordan Zimmerman >><[email protected]> wrote: >>> * Can someone give more detail on Op.check()? I assume it generates an >>> error if the version of the path doesn't match, but the doc is confusing >>> to me. What happens if the transaction has both a setData and a check? >>> >> >>I believe processing stops as soon as a check fails. We should clarify >>that in the javadocs though. >> >>> * Does ZooKeeper.multi() guarantee that there will be exactly 1 OpResult >>> for every Op in the transaction. Further, is there an ordering guarantee >>> for the OpResult list - i.e. the OpResults are in the same order as the >>> Ops argument? If this isn't so, I don't see how someone could correlate >>>an >>> Op to its result. >> >>Did the patch for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1336 >>not do a good enough job on that? >> >>> >>> On 1/4/12 7:30 AM, "Ted Dunning" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>>Not really. >>>> >>>>On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 12:47 AM, Jordan Zimmerman >>>><[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Is there documentation on the multi/transaction feature added in 3.4 >>>>>other >>>>> than the Javadoc? >>>>> >>>>> -JZ >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> >
