On 27 September 2015 at 10:12, Ibrahim El-sanosi (PGR) < [email protected]> wrote:
> Thank you Flavio for explanation. It really makes sense for me. > > > I'm not sure why you are assuming 3.4.6, though. Why is it relevant for > this question? > > I am assuming 3.4.6 because first I use this version, second I do not know > about dynamic configuration 3.5.0 as it may have different solution for > mentioned scenario. > I don't think dynamic reconfiguration changes anything about how proposals, acks, commits (i.e.: ZAB proper) work. Unless you are thinking of mixing an in-flight reconfiguration request with the crashing servers example that you gave.... -rgs
