On 01/26/12 02:40 PM, Srinivasa Sarva wrote:
April,
Thanks for the review. Comments inline..
Incremental webrev
http://jurassic.us.oracle.com/net/ssarva-us/export/home/srini/test/Jan24/webrev-1/index.html
webrev
http://jurassic.us.oracle.com/net/ssarva-us/export/home/srini/test/Jan24/webrev/index.html
On 01/26/12 12:52, April Chin wrote:
components/libedit/Makefile:
26 COMPONENT_VERSION= 20110802-3.0
27 IPS_COMPONENT_VERSION= 3.0
...
29 COMPONENT_SRC= $(COMPONENT_NAME)-$(COMPONENT_VERSION)
COMPONENT_VERSION is used for the name of the archive file to be
downloaded.
And IPS_COMPONENT_VERSION is for the package version # for the
libedit package.
Since you seem to have an update 20110802 to version 3.0, you
should include 20110802 in the IPS_COMPONENT_VERSION, to update and
distinguish
between this version 3.0 of libedit and a possible subsequent update
of version 3.0.
I don't know how libedit's versioning scheme works, but if there
won't be any
micro versions of 3.0 (e.g., 3.0.1), you might use 3.0.20110802 for
IPS_COMPONENT_VERSION.
In case there could be microversions, it would be better to use
3.0.0.20110802.
When Libedit was in SFW it had something like below
NAME: libedit-20061228
VERSION: 2.10
In future, when we have a upgrade available it will be
libedit-2012XXXX-3.xx
we can distinguish the VERSION by using 3.xx.
So I think you're saying that 20110802 is not really part of the version #,
and when a newer version comes along, it will be something like 3.0.XX
or 3.1.
Okay, sounds good.
components/libedit/libedit.license:
This file should include the component name & version and TPNO #, per
the third party
license tool (it looks like TPNO #7013).
You can follow what was done for other components' license files.
See isc-dhcp/isc-dhcp.license or other license files for examples.
You have copyright lines included above the license, which is what
should be done for the BSD license,
although the third party tool entry doesn't list the copyright line,
only the license
(maybe the entry needs to be corrected?).
Corrected the license file.
Thanks. One more comment on libedit.license.
I don't think you want to put the Oracle copyright in there.
April
Thanks
Srini
April
_______________________________________________
userland-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/userland-discuss