On 02/10/12 15:59, Danek Duvall wrote:
Ali Bahrami wrote:
http://linkers.us.oracle.com/webrev/7117531/index.html
Is there a 1:1& onto relationship between the .el.gz files in
gnu-emacs-lisp and gnu-emacs? Seems like there might be some room for
autogenerating one from the other, and reducing the amount of copy/paste
work that appears to be necessary currently.
For dldump.patch and sysmalloc.patch, nothing's changed but the patch
header, so there's no reason to include them.
Looks fine otherwise.
Danek
There is, though I think there can be occasional exceptions.
The cut/paste isn't as bad as it appears. I use
gmake sample-manifest
to get a list of all the files that the emacs installer delivers
to the proto, and then:
- All .el.gz files go to gnu-emacs-lisp manifest
- The executables go into their corresponding gnu-emacs-XXX
manifests
- Anything left goes into the main gnu-emacs manifest.
Although the webrev makes it look otherwise, it's a simple
and largely mechanical process.
Thanks!
- Ali
_______________________________________________
userland-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/userland-discuss
