On 4/17/06, Cagatay Civici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well Mike, I have some new features and enhancements in my mind. Adding > these features making a release at jsf-comp, receive feedback and > stabilizing them seems a good idea at first glance. > > The other way around should be that the library is committed to sandbox and > I provide patches. I favor the first way since I am a commiter at jsf-comp > and people planning to use the library need to build sandbox from source by > themselves. > > I'm confused a bit now, maybe you should decide both ways are fine for me in > the end.
I think it's perfectly fine if you release them from jsf-comp, from the sandbox, or both. :) Since there's some question about how these will fit in with ADF Faces and since you're planning on more changes, you might find jsf-comp a good place to start if you don't mind the extra work of releasing them yourself. Whether or not they are available at jsf-comp should have no bearing on whether we commit them to the sandbox, but increasing the user-base and quality of the code probably will encourage us to act more quickly :) As you point out, currently end-users have to do a checkout and manually build the sandbox, so that limits who'd be able to use the component if it's not in a usable sandbox state during a Tomahawk release.
