Hi I tried to mix Trinidad casablanca skin with some Themeroller skins. Just take a look at these two images:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12533046/redmond%2Bcasablanca-2.png https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12533047/south-street%2Bcasablanca-2.png It just shows how powerful is actually MyFaces Trinidad. regards, Leonardo Uribe 2012/6/22 Joachim Schrod <[email protected]>: > Scott O'Bryan wrote: >>> >>> E.g., I'm active in TeX development since 1982. Without our user >>> communities, our mailing lists and newsgroups, our fora, where >>> user-level questions are answered, we developers couldn't make it. >>> IMHO, both aspects of community are needed. Or do you think that >>> the postings here with user questions are not answered because >>> they're too difficult? >> I fully agree with this Joachim. Thing is, there are some >> questions that get answered and some that don't. Targeted and >> informed questions where the user has done their research and has >> discovered an issue typically get a response. Ones where people say >> "My app is broken, here it is, fix it" don't. > > The latter is clear, no OSS project is going to do that. For > specific problems, creation of a minimal example is a demand that's > mandatory if one wants to keep sane. > >>>> If there is some >>>> functionality you'd like to see in Trinidad, please open up a >>>> discussion on the dev list about it. We'd like to hear from you. >>> Hmm, my 1st wish would be simple: >>> Package the SVN-tagged 1.2.15 release. :-) >> HAHA. ;) I get ya! Like I say, 1.2 has not been my priority and >> unless you're looking at taking it over, I think it will be the >> last 1.2.. > > Since I sit here at 1:40 am, working on the next TeX Live release > and on our new CTAN Web site, I'm afraid I'll have problems to pack > even part-time responsibility for another open source project in my > schedule. More than two hours a day on a regular base for personal > OSS projects is not possible. :-) > >> I do have a question for you since you seem to be wanting it >> released... It's one that I have not got an answer for. Do you >> think that 1.2.15 should have the few outstanding bugs commited to >> the already tagged release or would you like to see the code from >> the experimental branches merged in as well. > > The few outstanding bugs are sufficient, IMO. > Integration of experimental branches can/shall be done by someone else. > > Probably a (semi-official?) declaration that 1.x is closed as long > as no new maintainer is forthcoming, but work on 2.x continues, > would be helpful, too. I know several commercial environments, > where such EOL announcements are business cases to budget > transformation projects. > > Thanks for taking the patience to answer my emails. > > Joachim > > -- > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > Joachim Schrod, Roedermark, Germany > Email: [email protected] >
