Guys, You've been typing tens of messages about a way to save a few characters in the compiler/interpreter name. Given your investment in keystrokes during the debate, the resulting name has better be short...
Just kidding ! Regards, Nicolas On 4/15/05, Keith J. Farmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For a compiler, 4 characters is about my limit. After all, it's all > about my code -- not the tool that is used to transform it into > something else. > > And it's not matter of there being a hard time -- it's a matter of > muddying the issue. You have to start prefixing when you start talking > about these things. While namespaces and long names work well in > computer languages, they don't work well in human languages. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Anthony Tarlano > Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 6:50 AM > > I still don't see the problem, since you don't type the '.exe' part so > it is just 'python.net' > > As for Brian's python for .NET, as good as I am sure it is, I really > have a hard time believing that any developer is going to have a hard > time telling the difference between IronPython and his.. > > _______________________________________________ > users-ironpython.com mailing list > users-ironpython.com@lists.ironpython.com > http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com > _______________________________________________ users-ironpython.com mailing list users-ironpython.com@lists.ironpython.com http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
