I have noticed that on windows world ppl are more used to using some sort of ide but on linux/unix world ppl (hackers?) like to do a lot on just shell using the name of the things they use. Since u r used to typing python and jython what do u say about "ipc"?
Ab. On 4/16/05, Anthony Tarlano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Keith, > > I don't think we are naming a compiler, but naming an interpreter. > > I am a long time Python (CPython) and Jython user and during > development. I never use an Ide other then Xemacs and in the shell > window I use the interpreter as a matter of productivity. > > So, given this background information, I am sure that you can see that > you are talking about 'Apples' and I am talking about 'Oranges'. Since > your usage pattern is an IDE and a Makefile, then your alias solution > is fine, but since I will consistantly be firing up a shell window and > typing the name of the interpreter, I want 'python.net' since I am > used to typing 'python' and 'jython'. > > Thanks, > > Anthony > > > On 4/15/05, Keith J. Farmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > People have been objecting to "IronPythonConsole" this whole time. If it > > were a matter of "just make an alias", then this discussion was moot from > > the beginning. For that matter, it was moot from before CSharpCompiler, > > CCompiler, or GnuCCompiler were created. > > > > So I don't think that it's as simple for those who originally raised their > > objections. I think the aim is for consistency, so we don't have to set > > aliases to use someone else's makefile. > > > > (Personally, I never objected to IronPythonConsole -- but if there's a > > movement to change it, I still say change it to be in line with the other > > existing naming patterns.) > > > > ________________________________ > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Joe Mason > > Sent: Fri 4/15/2005 9:47 AM > > To: Discussion of IronPython > > Subject: Re: [IronPython] To Compile or Not to compile, that's the question > > > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 10:02:03AM -0700, Keith J. Farmer wrote: > > > For a compiler, 4 characters is about my limit. After all, it's all > > > about my code -- not the tool that is used to transform it into > > > something else. > > > > You type the name of the compiler by hand a lot? Wouldn't it be invoked > > from a Makefile or IDE 90% of the time? > > > > Besides, if you really object to a name longer than 4 characters, you > > can always make an alias, but if there's a name class, it's harder to > > alias from an ambiguous name to a non-ambiguous one. So it's better to > > err on the side of non-ambiguity. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > users-ironpython.com mailing list > > users-ironpython.com@lists.ironpython.com > > http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > users-ironpython.com mailing list > users-ironpython.com@lists.ironpython.com > http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com > _______________________________________________ users-ironpython.com mailing list users-ironpython.com@lists.ironpython.com http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
