bsnyder wrote:
>
> On Feb 13, 2008 4:17 PM, GeekPro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I mean the transportConnector Address..NeverMind I am clear in this but
>> comming to our networkConnector
>>
>> In broker1 the network Connector will have the
>>
>> uri = "static:(tcp://10.0.0.2:62626)"
>>
>> In broker2 the network Connector will have th
>>
>> uri = "static:(tcp://10.0.0.2:61616)"
>>
>>
>> Step 1:
>> So from the Subscriber I had 2 instances one is listening to 61616 and
>> the
>> other with 62626(with out failover protocol)
>
> OK, you have a subscriber pointing to each broker.
>
>> Here in step1 if the 61616 gets the message then listener with 62626 is
>> not
>> getting the messagep
>
> If you're expecting each subscriber to get a copy of the messages
> you're sending, you'll need to use topics.
>
>> Step2 :
>>
>> I have one more instance which is listening to both 61616 and 62626
>> (with
>> failover protocol)
>>
>> Here if the message goes to 62626 then the listener can't get the message
>> in
>> the failover I mentioned 61616 address as the first arg.
>
> Well if you're using failover, then a random connection will be made
> one of the brokers. I doubt this is the behavior that you want.
>
> The easiest way to test any topology with ActiveMQ is using the
> consumer/producer examples that come with ActiveMQ. I just did this,
> in fact. I configured three brokers, brokerA points to brokerB,
> brokerB points to brokerA and brokerC, brokerC points to brokerB. So I
> have a linear topology that looks like this:
>
> brokerB(61611) <--> brokerB(61612) <--> brokerC(61613)
>
> In one terminal, I cd into the the ActiveMQ example directory and I
> run 'ant consumer -Durl=tcp://localhost:61611'. Then in another
> terminal, I cd into the ActiveMQ example directory and I run 'ant
> producer -Durl=tcp://localhost:61613'. The messages are produced to
> brokerC and the consumer on brokerA consumes them. This is a very
> basic example but the example consumer and producer that come with
> ActiveMQ have many, many options allowing you to test any topology
> quite easily.
>
> Bruce
> --
> perl -e 'print
> unpack("u30","D0G)[EMAIL PROTECTED]&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
> );'
>
> Apache ActiveMQ - http://activemq.org/
> Apache Camel - http://activemq.org/camel/
> Apache ServiceMix - http://servicemix.org/
> Apache Geronimo - http://geronimo.apache.org/
>
> Blog: http://bruceblog.org/
>
>
FYI-- I am using hermes tool along with ActiveMQ for producing and consuming
messages.
YES I am using Topics but I didn't get the messages on both the listeners (I
got it only on one)
Yes I am interested in failover -(Subscriber) and also (Producer)
Below is the code which I am using on the Client side for producing and
consuming messages
Note: I am using different IP address
Producer : failover://(tcp://10.0.0.1:61616,tcp://10.0.0.2:62626)
Subscriber: failover://(tcp://10.0.0.1:61616,tcp://10.0.0.2:62626)
Lets say when we produce the message it went to 62626.
But when we consume with the uri mentioned above I am not getting the
message.
Please tell me whether its a conf problem or my assumption is wrong.
Thanks
Gi
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Regarding-Store-and-Forward%3A-Network-of-Brokers-tp15464878s2354p15471571.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
