Thanks Rob. It seems amazing to me that the product is broken when used like I am, and no one noticed. Maybe my test case could be made into a unit test or something?
-Nate rajdavies wrote: > > > On 5 Jun 2008, at 23:43, NateS wrote: > >> >> We had been using 4.1.1 and recently upgraded to 5.1. Everything >> seemed fine >> at first, but after a while we found some messages were not being >> received. >> I wrote the test below that reproduces the problem. With 5.1, after >> running >> the test for a little while the test will stop because a message was >> sent >> and not received within the (very liberal) timeout. Reverting back >> to 4.1.1 >> and the test works fine. It also appears to work fine on 4.1.2. >> >> To run the test, change SERVER in the provider URL of both source >> files. >> Then run the JmsReceiverTest first, then run the JmsSenderTest. With a >> timeout of 2 seconds we see failure with 5.1 after about 200 >> messages. With >> a timeout of 60 seconds failure happens at ~8000 messages. >> >> This appears to be a bug with ActiveMQ 5.1, however I'd appreciate >> any input >> you might have if you think there is a better solution to achieve >> the same >> goal. >> >> http://www.nabble.com/file/p17681102/JmsReceiverTest.java >> JmsReceiverTest.java >> http://www.nabble.com/file/p17681102/JmsSenderTest.java >> JmsSenderTest.java >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-5.1-broken---repro-test-included-tp17681102s2354p17681102.html >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > > I created a jira for this - AMQ-1778 > > > cheers, > > Rob > > http://open.iona.com/products/enterprise-activemq > http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-5.1-broken---repro-test-included-tp17681102p18035660.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
