Yes. Use 'duplex' forwarding bridges. http://activemq.apache.org/networks-of-brokers.html
Joe Free ActiveMQ user guide @ http://www.ttmsolutions.com project2501 wrote: > > Thanks for the suggestion. I see now, the documentation for Camel. > > It would be nice, in the future, if a broker will create a reverse bridge > to a broker that connects to it. > > For example, I have broker A that I want to bridge to B,C,D,E, but doesn't > know where to find them. It cannot use multicast. But B,C,D,E know where > to find A. They declare A as a network connection. If A would then > "reverse" the connection for every client that connects (as a property), > then the problem of non-multicast discovery is solved without writing > complex Camel bean code to watch for certain events. > > Is this possible the way I described? > > thanks. > > > James.Strachan wrote: >> >> 2009/1/28 project2501 <[email protected]>: >>> >>> Hi, >>> Is there a way to inform ActiveMQ to bridge to a new static tcp: broker >>> address after it is running? >>> I need to dynamically update the snf bridges, but won't have multicast >>> ability. >>> >>> Can I do this without modifying the config and restarting it? Maybe via >>> API >>> or REST interface? >> >> You can add and remove new Camel routes bridging from one broker to >> another; hosting them in any JVM anywhere - or as an OSGi bundle >> within an OSGi container you host the ActiveMQ broker (such as >> ServiceMix Kernel) >> >> -- >> James >> ------- >> http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ >> >> Open Source Integration >> http://fusesource.com/ >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Update-Broker-Bridging-while-running--tp21709846p21727729.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
