Hey thanks for your reply- :-) Yes I provided a test case a few days ago. I worked pretty hard getting this test case for you guys. I attached all the files to this thread after Timothy Bish asked for it in this thread. See a few replies earlier starting with "I'm attaching a sample app, configurations, and logs in a zip file..." as it explains the problem. See the "Zip file uploaded..." reply by me that contains a working console application using the official NMS 1.1. provider as well as all the code in the VS 2008 solution. I also uploaded the sql jdbc and c3po connection pooler jar files in this thread on a later reply if one wants to use Sql Server to test.
Would think if JDBC Master/Slave in ActiveMQ 5.3 doesn't work with NMS than that's a big deal for .NET community which is growing larger and larger every day. Would think that if JDBC Master/Slave is a general problem with ActiveMQ 5.3 itself than that is an even bigger problem. This is why I asked if anyone had JDBC Master/Slave working with ActiveMQ 5.3. Either way right now this is a huge priority for us to get a resolution on as we are running into Async/unmatched acknowledgement errors on the broker end when testing ActiveMQ 5.2 with a high volume of messages. We are looking to try ActiveMQ 5.3 as it looks to have resolved a lot of memory related issues with prefetch/caching/duplicate messages and such. So hopefully someone can help us out. Please let me know if I can help out more. This is a main priority for us right now and we are willing to help out as much as possible. :-) But can't do much more now until someone confirms this is or isn't a problem using the console application I provided to run the test. -Regards rajdavies wrote: > > sorry to hear that Mark - do you have a test case ? > On 24 Sep 2009, at 16:08, magellings wrote: > >> >> Hello. I haven't gotten any feedback on this issue. To me seems >> rather >> important as JDBC Master/Slave is a common configuration and if it >> doesn't >> work with the NMS provider we at least will be out of luck with >> using 5.3 >> when it is released. This is of course if it is a problem with 5.3. >> >> Could anyone at least reply if they have JDBC Master/Slave working >> with >> version 5.3 of ActiveMQ? >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/Getting-negative-number-of-pending-messages-tp22106707p25575327.html >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > > Rob Davies > http://twitter.com/rajdavies > I work here: http://fusesource.com > My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ > I'm writing this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/ > > > > > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Getting-negative-number-of-pending-messages-tp22106707p25613901.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
